<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 394 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242172</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the cross-objection of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the importance of past history and reasonable estimation in tax assessments, reducing disallowances and deletions made by the Income Tax Officer based on lack of evidence or excessive amounts. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various additions and deletions, providing relief to the assessee on several grounds while maintaining a balanced approach to expense disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 394 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242172</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the cross-objection of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the importance of past history and reasonable estimation in tax assessments, reducing disallowances and deletions made by the Income Tax Officer based on lack of evidence or excessive amounts. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various additions and deletions, providing relief to the assessee on several grounds while maintaining a balanced approach to expense disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>