<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 386 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242164</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the deduction under Section 80IA should be computed after setting off the depreciation and expenses related to each WEG unit. The AO was directed to recompute the deduction based on the profit from each unit and allocate the depreciation accordingly. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deleted, as the payments were for a service contract, not rent. The appeal of the revenue was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 386 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242164</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the deduction under Section 80IA should be computed after setting off the depreciation and expenses related to each WEG unit. The AO was directed to recompute the deduction based on the profit from each unit and allocate the depreciation accordingly. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deleted, as the payments were for a service contract, not rent. The appeal of the revenue was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>