<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 380 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242156</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the redemption fine imposed on a 100% EOU manufacturing polyester yarn as the goods were not physically seized, making confiscation and release on redemption fine invalid. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that partners cannot face personal penalties when the firm is already penalized, aligning with a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat. Consequently, the penalties on the partners were also set aside, disposing of both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:42:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 380 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242156</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the redemption fine imposed on a 100% EOU manufacturing polyester yarn as the goods were not physically seized, making confiscation and release on redemption fine invalid. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that partners cannot face personal penalties when the firm is already penalized, aligning with a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat. Consequently, the penalties on the partners were also set aside, disposing of both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>