https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242155 The Tribunal condoned the marginal delay in filing appeals, directing the registry to proceed with stay petitions and appeals. Regarding allegations of clandestine removal of goods and under valuation, the Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed examination of evidence to establish liability. Despite financial hardship claimed by the appellants, specific deposit amounts were ordered within set deadlines, with recovery stayed pending appeal resolution. The judgment addressed issues of delay, clandestine practices, financial challenges, and pre-deposit requirements, considering evidence including admissions and supplier statements. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:42:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242155 The Tribunal condoned the marginal delay in filing appeals, directing the registry to proceed with stay petitions and appeals. Regarding allegations of clandestine removal of goods and under valuation, the Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed examination of evidence to establish liability. Despite financial hardship claimed by the appellants, specific deposit amounts were ordered within set deadlines, with recovery stayed pending appeal resolution. The judgment addressed issues of delay, clandestine practices, financial challenges, and pre-deposit requirements, considering evidence including admissions and supplier statements. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242155