<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Same excise invoice series for all factories - Whether permitted?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106401</link>
    <description>Using a single pooled invoice series across multiple excise-registered factories raises compliance risk because invoices must be serially numbered and linked to the respective unit&#039;s registration; the serialisation scheme should be intimated to the Range Office. Advice given is to customise accounting software to generate unit-specific serial sequences to ensure independent, reconcilable numbering for monthly returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:31:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Same excise invoice series for all factories - Whether permitted?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106401</link>
      <description>Using a single pooled invoice series across multiple excise-registered factories raises compliance risk because invoices must be serially numbered and linked to the respective unit&#039;s registration; the serialisation scheme should be intimated to the Range Office. Advice given is to customise accounting software to generate unit-specific serial sequences to ensure independent, reconcilable numbering for monthly returns.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:31:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>