<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of the adjudication order requiring a 3% loading on the declared invoice value of imported goods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the royalty payment should not be included in the assessable value unless it was a condition for the sale of imported goods, as per a previous Supreme Court decision. Since there was no evidence supporting such a condition in this case, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and provided consequential relief, emphasizing the lack of nexus between royalty payments and the imported goods&#039; value based on the agreement terms and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of the adjudication order requiring a 3% loading on the declared invoice value of imported goods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the royalty payment should not be included in the assessable value unless it was a condition for the sale of imported goods, as per a previous Supreme Court decision. Since there was no evidence supporting such a condition in this case, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and provided consequential relief, emphasizing the lack of nexus between royalty payments and the imported goods&#039; value based on the agreement terms and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>