<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 354 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161152</link>
    <description>A transferee was not made liable for a seller&#039;s outstanding tax dues because the record showed purchase of land, building, machinery and raw materials, but not transfer of the entire business; section 9(1) applied only on a complete transfer of business ownership. The attempt to sustain the notice under section 11AAA also failed because the transfer was for valuable consideration, there was no notice of departmental dues, no material showed intent to defraud the Revenue, and the notice did not plead the essential statutory ingredients. The notice was therefore quashed and recovery of the seller&#039;s dues from the transferee was restrained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 354 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161152</link>
      <description>A transferee was not made liable for a seller&#039;s outstanding tax dues because the record showed purchase of land, building, machinery and raw materials, but not transfer of the entire business; section 9(1) applied only on a complete transfer of business ownership. The attempt to sustain the notice under section 11AAA also failed because the transfer was for valuable consideration, there was no notice of departmental dues, no material showed intent to defraud the Revenue, and the notice did not plead the essential statutory ingredients. The notice was therefore quashed and recovery of the seller&#039;s dues from the transferee was restrained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>