<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 411 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161144</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the writ petition, ruling that the order for a fresh notice by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner did not extend the limitation period for revision under section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. This decision deprived the respondent of jurisdiction to revise the assessment. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 411 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161144</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the writ petition, ruling that the order for a fresh notice by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner did not extend the limitation period for revision under section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. This decision deprived the respondent of jurisdiction to revise the assessment. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>