<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 359 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant qualified as an &#039;Authorized Service Station&#039; of M/s Tata Motors based on evidence of a close relationship and service provision. The demand for Service Tax was not time-barred as the appellant failed to inform the department of changes in service status. Disputes regarding the calculation of Service Tax were not addressed due to procedural issues. Despite financial hardship claims, the Tribunal required a pre-deposit before further actions, denying an unconditional stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 359 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant qualified as an &#039;Authorized Service Station&#039; of M/s Tata Motors based on evidence of a close relationship and service provision. The demand for Service Tax was not time-barred as the appellant failed to inform the department of changes in service status. Disputes regarding the calculation of Service Tax were not addressed due to procedural issues. Despite financial hardship claims, the Tribunal required a pre-deposit before further actions, denying an unconditional stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>