https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242128 The Tribunal extended the compliance date under its earlier stay orders because the six-week period fixed for deposit was considered too short and the appellants had been absent when that date was set; the revised date was moved to 22 September 2011, and the direction was made integral to the earlier stay orders. It also corrected a typographical error in the appeal number on the title sheet, changing it from ST/3/10 to ST/05/10, and directed that the rectification form part of the earlier pronouncement. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:26:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242128 The Tribunal extended the compliance date under its earlier stay orders because the six-week period fixed for deposit was considered too short and the appellants had been absent when that date was set; the revised date was moved to 22 September 2011, and the direction was made integral to the earlier stay orders. It also corrected a typographical error in the appeal number on the title sheet, changing it from ST/3/10 to ST/05/10, and directed that the rectification form part of the earlier pronouncement. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242128