<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 351 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(Appeals) in both issues, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment clarified the application of relevant sections of the Income Tax Act and emphasized the need for proper assessment based on commercial expediency and contractual obligations in determining disallowances and additions to income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 351 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(Appeals) in both issues, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment clarified the application of relevant sections of the Income Tax Act and emphasized the need for proper assessment based on commercial expediency and contractual obligations in determining disallowances and additions to income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>