<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 348 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to medical reasons and allowing the depreciation claim on a commercial bus. It emphasized the importance of proving ownership and usage for depreciation claims, disregarding transport rule violations as grounds for disallowance. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting that technical limitations should not impede valid claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 348 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to medical reasons and allowing the depreciation claim on a commercial bus. It emphasized the importance of proving ownership and usage for depreciation claims, disregarding transport rule violations as grounds for disallowance. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting that technical limitations should not impede valid claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>