<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 343 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee (a joint venture) was not liable to deduct TDS on payments made to its partners, as the relationship between the JV and its partners was not that of a contractor and sub-contractor. Consequently, the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) could not be invoked, and the disallowance made by the AO was deleted. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 343 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee (a joint venture) was not liable to deduct TDS on payments made to its partners, as the relationship between the JV and its partners was not that of a contractor and sub-contractor. Consequently, the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) could not be invoked, and the disallowance made by the AO was deleted. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>