<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 339 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242115</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals by the assessees, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s finding and permitting the deduction claimed under section 80IB for DEPB and Duty Draw Back. The ITAT referred to precedents and the amended section of the Act, emphasizing the importance of considering amended provisions in judgments. The decision was based on the debatable nature of the issue, making it ineligible for correction under section 154. The ITAT concluded that the deduction was not a glaring mistake and, therefore, upheld the appeal, directing the allowance of the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 339 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242115</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals by the assessees, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s finding and permitting the deduction claimed under section 80IB for DEPB and Duty Draw Back. The ITAT referred to precedents and the amended section of the Act, emphasizing the importance of considering amended provisions in judgments. The decision was based on the debatable nature of the issue, making it ineligible for correction under section 154. The ITAT concluded that the deduction was not a glaring mistake and, therefore, upheld the appeal, directing the allowance of the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>