https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242097 The Tribunal allowed the application for recalling the final order due to non-prosecution, stating the appeal should not have been dismissed. The appellant was directed to deposit 50% of the duties to proceed with the appeal, concerning the denial of Cenvat credit for steel items used for supporting structural purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance by a specified date, with recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. en-us Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:17:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242097 The Tribunal allowed the application for recalling the final order due to non-prosecution, stating the appeal should not have been dismissed. The appellant was directed to deposit 50% of the duties to proceed with the appeal, concerning the denial of Cenvat credit for steel items used for supporting structural purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance by a specified date, with recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242097