<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 343 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161137</link>
    <description>An assessment based on third-party denials cannot be sustained unless those denials are disclosed to the assessee and a fair opportunity to rebut them is given. Here, the adverse finding that the assessee had falsely disclosed consignee details rested on written denials allegedly obtained from the purported consignees, but those materials were not furnished during the assessment. As the assessee could not effectively meet the allegation without access to the foundation of the demand, the proceedings were held to be vitiated by breach of natural justice. The assessment order and consequential demand notice were therefore set aside for want of reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:16:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 343 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161137</link>
      <description>An assessment based on third-party denials cannot be sustained unless those denials are disclosed to the assessee and a fair opportunity to rebut them is given. Here, the adverse finding that the assessee had falsely disclosed consignee details rested on written denials allegedly obtained from the purported consignees, but those materials were not furnished during the assessment. As the assessee could not effectively meet the allegation without access to the foundation of the demand, the proceedings were held to be vitiated by breach of natural justice. The assessment order and consequential demand notice were therefore set aside for want of reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>