<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (12) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161128</link>
    <description>Section 45-B of the Banking Companies Act, read with section 45-G and Part III-A, permits summary proceedings by way of application to decide claims arising in the winding up of a banking company; the Court&#039;s remedial power and rule-making authority support application procedure as the normal mode, and the Court affirmed that summary application is appropriate. Where the Court is competent to decide the subject-matter under section 45-B, a decree obtained on a summary application is within jurisdiction and is not a nullity merely because a later contention disputes the form of proceedings; the decree and dismissal of the challenge were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (12) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161128</link>
      <description>Section 45-B of the Banking Companies Act, read with section 45-G and Part III-A, permits summary proceedings by way of application to decide claims arising in the winding up of a banking company; the Court&#039;s remedial power and rule-making authority support application procedure as the normal mode, and the Court affirmed that summary application is appropriate. Where the Court is competent to decide the subject-matter under section 45-B, a decree obtained on a summary application is within jurisdiction and is not a nullity merely because a later contention disputes the form of proceedings; the decree and dismissal of the challenge were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>