<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 313 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242088</link>
    <description>The tribunal confirmed a service tax demand of Rs.88,18,758 against the appellant for various taxable services. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification No. 24/2004 for commercial training was rejected, except for training in the French language for employment purposes. The issue of club or association service taxation was settled in favor of the assessee. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the taxability of distinct receipts under business support service and renting of immovable property services were dismissed. The tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit but required payment of specified tax amounts within a set timeframe to stay further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 313 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242088</link>
      <description>The tribunal confirmed a service tax demand of Rs.88,18,758 against the appellant for various taxable services. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification No. 24/2004 for commercial training was rejected, except for training in the French language for employment purposes. The issue of club or association service taxation was settled in favor of the assessee. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the taxability of distinct receipts under business support service and renting of immovable property services were dismissed. The tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit but required payment of specified tax amounts within a set timeframe to stay further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>