<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 312 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242087</link>
    <description>Services received from the International Finance Corporation were treated as subject to service tax on reverse charge basis, but the governing enactment was read as providing exemption from duties and taxes for such services. Because the appellant had already deposited a substantial part of the demand, that deposit was considered adequate for hearing the appeal. The remaining pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the balance demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:06:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 312 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242087</link>
      <description>Services received from the International Finance Corporation were treated as subject to service tax on reverse charge basis, but the governing enactment was read as providing exemption from duties and taxes for such services. Because the appellant had already deposited a substantial part of the demand, that deposit was considered adequate for hearing the appeal. The remaining pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the balance demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>