https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242086 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal disposal. It found that the services provided by the group concern in the USA did not fall under the category of "Business Auxiliary Service," as no service charge was involved in the transactions. The tribunal determined that the group concern did not retain any commission for the services rendered, supporting the appellant's position that the services were not taxable. en-us Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:06:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242086 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal disposal. It found that the services provided by the group concern in the USA did not fall under the category of "Business Auxiliary Service," as no service charge was involved in the transactions. The tribunal determined that the group concern did not retain any commission for the services rendered, supporting the appellant's position that the services were not taxable. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242086