https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242083 The Tribunal held that the appellant was not eligible for the composition scheme under the works contract and directed them to pay an additional sum. Regarding the construction of Ash Dyke, the Tribunal determined it falls under Commercial/Industrial Construction service, not site formation, thus no differential tax was owed. The Tribunal instructed the appellant to deposit a specific sum for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of balance dues, with compliance deadlines set. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:06:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242083 The Tribunal held that the appellant was not eligible for the composition scheme under the works contract and directed them to pay an additional sum. Regarding the construction of Ash Dyke, the Tribunal determined it falls under Commercial/Industrial Construction service, not site formation, thus no differential tax was owed. The Tribunal instructed the appellant to deposit a specific sum for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of balance dues, with compliance deadlines set. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242083