<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 299 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242074</link>
    <description>The court dismissed all five appeals, upholding the initial jurisdiction assumed by the Delhi authorities under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The subsequent transfer to Rohtak did not invalidate the proceedings. The court found no merit in the arguments challenging the reopening of assessment by a non-jurisdictional assessing officer, emphasizing compliance with legal requirements. Additionally, the court held that the principle of judicial consistency did not invalidate the Tribunal&#039;s order, which properly appreciated evidence and adhered to legal provisions, ultimately affirming the income tax charge on the undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 299 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242074</link>
      <description>The court dismissed all five appeals, upholding the initial jurisdiction assumed by the Delhi authorities under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The subsequent transfer to Rohtak did not invalidate the proceedings. The court found no merit in the arguments challenging the reopening of assessment by a non-jurisdictional assessing officer, emphasizing compliance with legal requirements. Additionally, the court held that the principle of judicial consistency did not invalidate the Tribunal&#039;s order, which properly appreciated evidence and adhered to legal provisions, ultimately affirming the income tax charge on the undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>