<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 295 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted additional evidence provided by the appellant, including investment portfolio review notes and depreciation details. It remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing consideration of the Supreme Court judgment in Southern Technologies Ltd. vs. JCIT. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:04:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 295 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted additional evidence provided by the appellant, including investment portfolio review notes and depreciation details. It remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing consideration of the Supreme Court judgment in Southern Technologies Ltd. vs. JCIT. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>