<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 294 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all miscellaneous applications filed by the assessee due to the lack of reasonable cause for non-appearance, as required by the proviso to Rule 24 and Rule 25 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963. The Tribunal emphasized that the explanations provided were not convincing, especially considering the failure to take proactive steps in prosecuting the appeals after the Senior Advocate&#039;s demise. The judgment was pronounced on 31st December 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:04:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 294 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all miscellaneous applications filed by the assessee due to the lack of reasonable cause for non-appearance, as required by the proviso to Rule 24 and Rule 25 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963. The Tribunal emphasized that the explanations provided were not convincing, especially considering the failure to take proactive steps in prosecuting the appeals after the Senior Advocate&#039;s demise. The judgment was pronounced on 31st December 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>