<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 283 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs.10,60,000, in favor of the assessee. It determined that the payment for uplinking charges was akin to a business loss and not subject to tax deduction at source. The Tribunal emphasized that the obligation to deduct tax at source lay with the payer, not the assessee, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the nature of the payment and the payer&#039;s responsibility for tax deduction at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 283 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs.10,60,000, in favor of the assessee. It determined that the payment for uplinking charges was akin to a business loss and not subject to tax deduction at source. The Tribunal emphasized that the obligation to deduct tax at source lay with the payer, not the assessee, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the nature of the payment and the payer&#039;s responsibility for tax deduction at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>