<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 270 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242045</link>
    <description>After price-list approval was dispensed with from 1 April 1994, the actual sale price reflected in invoices and gate passes became relevant for valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, rather than the earlier approved price. On that basis, the appellant was found to have established a prima facie case for complete waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery. The predeposit of duty was accordingly waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 06:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 270 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242045</link>
      <description>After price-list approval was dispensed with from 1 April 1994, the actual sale price reflected in invoices and gate passes became relevant for valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, rather than the earlier approved price. On that basis, the appellant was found to have established a prima facie case for complete waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery. The predeposit of duty was accordingly waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>