https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242043 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the classification of the product "Roop Amruta" under Chapter Heading 3004 9011 as an Ayurvedic medicine, rejecting the Revenue's claim for classification under Heading 3304 9910. The extended period of limitation demand was deemed unjustified as the appellant consistently declared the product under Chapter 3004.9011. The classification dispute for the product "Daant Pari" was also resolved in favor of the appellant, allowing for the dispensation of pre-deposit conditions for all dues and penalties, leading to the unconditional allowance of the stay petitions. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jan 2014 06:28:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242043 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the classification of the product "Roop Amruta" under Chapter Heading 3004 9011 as an Ayurvedic medicine, rejecting the Revenue's claim for classification under Heading 3304 9910. The extended period of limitation demand was deemed unjustified as the appellant consistently declared the product under Chapter 3004.9011. The classification dispute for the product "Daant Pari" was also resolved in favor of the appellant, allowing for the dispensation of pre-deposit conditions for all dues and penalties, leading to the unconditional allowance of the stay petitions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242043