<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 266 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242041</link>
    <description>The appellant was directed to pay a penalty of Rs.5,000 under Rule 27 of Central Excise 2002 for defaulting on duty payment, despite conflicting tribunal decisions. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s full duty deposit via the Cenvat credit account, waiving the pre-deposit condition. The stay petition was unconditionally granted, contingent on the appellant paying the penalty within four weeks. The judgment emphasized the importance of favoring the assessee in cases of conflicting legal interpretations and stressed timely compliance with directives. Compliance verification was scheduled for a specified date, ensuring transparency and accountability in the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 06:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 266 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242041</link>
      <description>The appellant was directed to pay a penalty of Rs.5,000 under Rule 27 of Central Excise 2002 for defaulting on duty payment, despite conflicting tribunal decisions. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s full duty deposit via the Cenvat credit account, waiving the pre-deposit condition. The stay petition was unconditionally granted, contingent on the appellant paying the penalty within four weeks. The judgment emphasized the importance of favoring the assessee in cases of conflicting legal interpretations and stressed timely compliance with directives. Compliance verification was scheduled for a specified date, ensuring transparency and accountability in the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>