https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242040 The judgment concludes that the impugned demands quantified on 'bagasse' and 'press mud' are prima facie liable to be set aside. The appellant's failure to maintain separate accounts for inputs did not render the items excisable under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Referring to a recent judgment, the court held that bagasse and press mud are not excisable goods. The stay application was allowed, leading to a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the adjudged dues, providing a clear resolution to the case issues. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242040 The judgment concludes that the impugned demands quantified on 'bagasse' and 'press mud' are prima facie liable to be set aside. The appellant's failure to maintain separate accounts for inputs did not render the items excisable under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Referring to a recent judgment, the court held that bagasse and press mud are not excisable goods. The stay application was allowed, leading to a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the adjudged dues, providing a clear resolution to the case issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242040