<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 264 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242039</link>
    <description>Special leave petitions in a Central Excise matter were dismissed solely on the ground of delay, so the Court did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute. The order records only that the petitions were time-barred and therefore not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 264 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242039</link>
      <description>Special leave petitions in a Central Excise matter were dismissed solely on the ground of delay, so the Court did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute. The order records only that the petitions were time-barred and therefore not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>