<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 263 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242038</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in the case involving M/s Bactolac Formulations Pvt. Ltd. that duty paid through CENVAT credit cannot be demanded again, preventing double payment. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, aligning with legal precedents like Solar Chemferts, and reduced the penalty to Rs.5,000 in accordance with Rule 27 and a Gujarat High Court ruling. This decision clarified the recoverability of duty and emphasized adherence to legal precedents and rules in penalty determinations, ultimately reducing the penalty on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 263 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242038</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in the case involving M/s Bactolac Formulations Pvt. Ltd. that duty paid through CENVAT credit cannot be demanded again, preventing double payment. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, aligning with legal precedents like Solar Chemferts, and reduced the penalty to Rs.5,000 in accordance with Rule 27 and a Gujarat High Court ruling. This decision clarified the recoverability of duty and emphasized adherence to legal precedents and rules in penalty determinations, ultimately reducing the penalty on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>