<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161120</link>
    <description>In preventive detention matters, the grounds of detention are incomplete unless the relied-upon documents, statements and tape-recorded materials are supplied within the statutory period for communication of grounds; failure to do so breaches Article 22(5) and the COFEPOSA safeguard, and the continued detention becomes illegal. The Court also held that representations against detention must be considered with promptness; inordinate administrative delay, where inadequately explained, defeats the constitutional right to an early and effective representation and likewise vitiates the detention. On both grounds, the continued detention was invalid and release was ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161120</link>
      <description>In preventive detention matters, the grounds of detention are incomplete unless the relied-upon documents, statements and tape-recorded materials are supplied within the statutory period for communication of grounds; failure to do so breaches Article 22(5) and the COFEPOSA safeguard, and the continued detention becomes illegal. The Court also held that representations against detention must be considered with promptness; inordinate administrative delay, where inadequately explained, defeats the constitutional right to an early and effective representation and likewise vitiates the detention. On both grounds, the continued detention was invalid and release was ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>