<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161115</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petitions filed by Aurangabad Paper Mills Ltd. and Nath Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. challenging the imposition of Excise duty on &quot;Sodium Rosinate.&quot; The court held that the petitioners could not claim a refund based on a previous decision by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) when they had not appealed the original assessments. Emphasizing the need to challenge assessments individually, the court rejected the petitions but granted a temporary stay on the order in one case where the Excise duty amount had been deposited with the court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161115</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petitions filed by Aurangabad Paper Mills Ltd. and Nath Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. challenging the imposition of Excise duty on &quot;Sodium Rosinate.&quot; The court held that the petitioners could not claim a refund based on a previous decision by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) when they had not appealed the original assessments. Emphasizing the need to challenge assessments individually, the court rejected the petitions but granted a temporary stay on the order in one case where the Excise duty amount had been deposited with the court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>