https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242035 The appellate refund order was set aside because it failed to decide two material objections: alleged non-service of notice of personal hearing and compliance with Notification No. 17/2009-ST. The refund had been rejected for non-compliance with the prescribed form and supporting documents under the substituted notification, but the appellate authority did not meaningfully address those findings. As service of notice and notification compliance were central to the validity of the rejection and the maintainability of the claim, the matter was remanded for de novo appellate consideration before any relief could be granted. en-us Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242035 The appellate refund order was set aside because it failed to decide two material objections: alleged non-service of notice of personal hearing and compliance with Notification No. 17/2009-ST. The refund had been rejected for non-compliance with the prescribed form and supporting documents under the substituted notification, but the appellate authority did not meaningfully address those findings. As service of notice and notification compliance were central to the validity of the rejection and the maintainability of the claim, the matter was remanded for de novo appellate consideration before any relief could be granted. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242035