<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242033</link>
    <description>The appellant, a consumer healthcare company, remitted funds to overseas technical testing and analysis agencies. The Revenue claimed the service fell under &quot;scientific or technical consultancy,&quot; but the appellant argued it should be classified as &quot;technical testing and analysis,&quot; exempt from tax. The adjudicating authority initially held the appellant liable for tax, but upon closer examination, it was determined the services aligned more with technical testing and analysis. The judgment quashed the tax liability, ruling the services were correctly classified as technical testing and analysis, outside the Act&#039;s purview. The appellant was exempt from tax, and the appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242033</link>
      <description>The appellant, a consumer healthcare company, remitted funds to overseas technical testing and analysis agencies. The Revenue claimed the service fell under &quot;scientific or technical consultancy,&quot; but the appellant argued it should be classified as &quot;technical testing and analysis,&quot; exempt from tax. The adjudicating authority initially held the appellant liable for tax, but upon closer examination, it was determined the services aligned more with technical testing and analysis. The judgment quashed the tax liability, ruling the services were correctly classified as technical testing and analysis, outside the Act&#039;s purview. The appellant was exempt from tax, and the appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>