<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating they were not liable to pay Service Tax on services received before 18-4-2006. The appellant was allowed to discharge their Service Tax liability through Cenvat credit and was deemed eligible to take credit of Service Tax paid by debiting the cenvat account. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant&#039;s actions were proper based on the circumstances at the relevant time, ultimately allowing the appeal and rejecting the demand for reversing the Cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:22:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating they were not liable to pay Service Tax on services received before 18-4-2006. The appellant was allowed to discharge their Service Tax liability through Cenvat credit and was deemed eligible to take credit of Service Tax paid by debiting the cenvat account. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant&#039;s actions were proper based on the circumstances at the relevant time, ultimately allowing the appeal and rejecting the demand for reversing the Cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>