<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 232 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the deletion of the addition for unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided a satisfactory explanation for the cash balance through entries in the books, including excise duty payments, withdrawals, and deposits. Therefore, as the cash balance was adequately explained, section 68 was deemed inapplicable, resulting in the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 232 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the deletion of the addition for unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided a satisfactory explanation for the cash balance through entries in the books, including excise duty payments, withdrawals, and deposits. Therefore, as the cash balance was adequately explained, section 68 was deemed inapplicable, resulting in the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>