https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241996 The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification, ruling that the non-consideration of certain judgments and a pending SLP before the Supreme Court did not constitute a mistake apparent on the face of the order. The Tribunal found the issue debatable and not a clear error warranting rectification, emphasizing that rectification is reserved for obvious and patent mistakes that do not require extensive reasoning to establish. The order was deemed not solely reliant on the judgment in question, leading to the rejection of the rectification application. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:19:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241996 The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification, ruling that the non-consideration of certain judgments and a pending SLP before the Supreme Court did not constitute a mistake apparent on the face of the order. The Tribunal found the issue debatable and not a clear error warranting rectification, emphasizing that rectification is reserved for obvious and patent mistakes that do not require extensive reasoning to establish. The order was deemed not solely reliant on the judgment in question, leading to the rejection of the rectification application. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241996