https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161114 A prior habeas corpus dismissal in the High Court did not bar a fresh Article 32 petition by res judicata or constructive res judicata, because the constitutional claim of illegal detention remained open for merits review. President's emergency suspension orders under Article 359 were upheld as non-discriminatory, since treating foreigners as a separate class satisfied intelligible differentia and rational nexus with national security objectives. The detention order under the Foreigners Act was also sustained, as the statutory power was construed broadly and the material did not establish mala fides or abuse of power. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161114 A prior habeas corpus dismissal in the High Court did not bar a fresh Article 32 petition by res judicata or constructive res judicata, because the constitutional claim of illegal detention remained open for merits review. President's emergency suspension orders under Article 359 were upheld as non-discriminatory, since treating foreigners as a separate class satisfied intelligible differentia and rational nexus with national security objectives. The detention order under the Foreigners Act was also sustained, as the statutory power was construed broadly and the material did not establish mala fides or abuse of power. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161114