https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241971 The Tribunal declined to rectify alleged mistakes in the order, stating that errors in amounts derived from the DRP's order were not within its purview. It also refused to rectify the treatment of expenses related to traveling to Singapore, directing the issue to the DRP. However, typographical errors in mentioning the mean margin of comparables and the recording of the assessee's contention were acknowledged and rectified. An incorrect figure regarding marketing services was corrected based on the TPO's findings, leading to the partial allowance of the miscellaneous application. en-us Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jan 2014 06:47:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241971 The Tribunal declined to rectify alleged mistakes in the order, stating that errors in amounts derived from the DRP's order were not within its purview. It also refused to rectify the treatment of expenses related to traveling to Singapore, directing the issue to the DRP. However, typographical errors in mentioning the mean margin of comparables and the recording of the assessee's contention were acknowledged and rectified. An incorrect figure regarding marketing services was corrected based on the TPO's findings, leading to the partial allowance of the miscellaneous application. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241971