<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 192 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for a proper assessment of fair market value to calculate accurate long-term capital gains. The decision was set aside, and the matter was remitted back for a fresh determination, considering the objections and the less than 15% difference in valuation. The Tribunal highlighted that minor differences in property valuation should be considered, granting the benefit to the assessee in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 192 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need for a proper assessment of fair market value to calculate accurate long-term capital gains. The decision was set aside, and the matter was remitted back for a fresh determination, considering the objections and the less than 15% difference in valuation. The Tribunal highlighted that minor differences in property valuation should be considered, granting the benefit to the assessee in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>