<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 190 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the appellant for the assessment year 2007-08. Despite arguments for retrospective application of a proviso inserted in the Act, the Tribunal held that the proviso could only be applied from 1.7.2012 onwards, not benefiting the appellant. The decision emphasized the necessity of complying with TDS provisions and the restricted scope of retrospective application of beneficial amendments, leading to the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 06:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 190 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the appellant for the assessment year 2007-08. Despite arguments for retrospective application of a proviso inserted in the Act, the Tribunal held that the proviso could only be applied from 1.7.2012 onwards, not benefiting the appellant. The decision emphasized the necessity of complying with TDS provisions and the restricted scope of retrospective application of beneficial amendments, leading to the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>