<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241958</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee company on both issues. The deduction claim for expenditure related to the increase in share capital was allowed under section 44 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal admitted the additional ground regarding the consideration of loss from the Pension Fund for determining surplus/(deficit) from the insurance business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241958</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee company on both issues. The deduction claim for expenditure related to the increase in share capital was allowed under section 44 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal admitted the additional ground regarding the consideration of loss from the Pension Fund for determining surplus/(deficit) from the insurance business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>