<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 174 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s authority to adjust incorrect claims apparent from the return under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This included applying the Minimum Alternate Tax provision under Section 115 JB to a company claiming deduction under Section 80-IC. The Tribunal held that the deduction under Section 80-IC was not an item of adjustment in computing book profits under Section 115 JB, making the claim for such deduction during the book profits computation an incorrect claim. Consequently, the Assessing Officer was justified in making the adjustment under Section 143(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 174 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s authority to adjust incorrect claims apparent from the return under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This included applying the Minimum Alternate Tax provision under Section 115 JB to a company claiming deduction under Section 80-IC. The Tribunal held that the deduction under Section 80-IC was not an item of adjustment in computing book profits under Section 115 JB, making the claim for such deduction during the book profits computation an incorrect claim. Consequently, the Assessing Officer was justified in making the adjustment under Section 143(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>