<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 154 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241929</link>
    <description>An order passed without following the principles of natural justice requires reconsideration after affording a proper opportunity of hearing. The first appellate authority had already set aside the original adjudication and remanded the matter on that ground, and the Tribunal agreed that the defect in procedure warranted fresh adjudication by the original authority. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision after compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 06:38:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 154 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241929</link>
      <description>An order passed without following the principles of natural justice requires reconsideration after affording a proper opportunity of hearing. The first appellate authority had already set aside the original adjudication and remanded the matter on that ground, and the Tribunal agreed that the defect in procedure warranted fresh adjudication by the original authority. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision after compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>