https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241885 CESTAT New Delhi took a prima facie view that Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules applied to the disputed body-building activity, relying on an earlier tribunal decision on similar facts treating the activity as job work. On that basis, it held that the confirmed duty demand could not be displaced at the stay stage and directed deposit of the entire duty demand within eight weeks. Pre-deposit of interest and penalties was waived only on such deposit, and recovery of those amounts was stayed until disposal of the appeals. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241885 CESTAT New Delhi took a prima facie view that Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules applied to the disputed body-building activity, relying on an earlier tribunal decision on similar facts treating the activity as job work. On that basis, it held that the confirmed duty demand could not be displaced at the stay stage and directed deposit of the entire duty demand within eight weeks. Pre-deposit of interest and penalties was waived only on such deposit, and recovery of those amounts was stayed until disposal of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241885