https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241883 The court upheld the Commissioner of Central Excise's demand for interest on the voluntarily paid differential duty by the appellant units, ruling that the payment triggered liability under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act. The court rejected the appellant's attempt to distinguish their case from precedent cases, directing them to pre-deposit a specified amount towards the interest demand. The court accepted the pre-deposit offer, granting a waiver and stay against the remaining balance of interest, resolving the stay applications and providing a clear directive for compliance. en-us Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241883 The court upheld the Commissioner of Central Excise's demand for interest on the voluntarily paid differential duty by the appellant units, ruling that the payment triggered liability under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act. The court rejected the appellant's attempt to distinguish their case from precedent cases, directing them to pre-deposit a specified amount towards the interest demand. The court accepted the pre-deposit offer, granting a waiver and stay against the remaining balance of interest, resolving the stay applications and providing a clear directive for compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241883