<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 101 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241876</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of Rs. 25 lakhs expenditure for releasing property rights and the application of section 50C to determine property market value. The ITAT upheld the decisions of the CIT(A), dismissing the appeal entirely. Legal precedents were cited to support the disallowance of expenditure related to encumbrances and the application of section 50C, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 101 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241876</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of Rs. 25 lakhs expenditure for releasing property rights and the application of section 50C to determine property market value. The ITAT upheld the decisions of the CIT(A), dismissing the appeal entirely. Legal precedents were cited to support the disallowance of expenditure related to encumbrances and the application of section 50C, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>