<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 78 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on Transfer Pricing adjustments for royalty payments, disallowance of COE-3 related expenses, and TP adjustments on David Beckham advertising campaign expenses. It dismissed the addition on account of bad debts recovered under Section 41(1) and confirmed disallowances of certain expenses. The Tribunal provided detailed directions for each issue, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 78 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on Transfer Pricing adjustments for royalty payments, disallowance of COE-3 related expenses, and TP adjustments on David Beckham advertising campaign expenses. It dismissed the addition on account of bad debts recovered under Section 41(1) and confirmed disallowances of certain expenses. The Tribunal provided detailed directions for each issue, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>