<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 67 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241842</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the import of raw silk from China did not align with the intended purpose of the exemption notification and was a misuse to evade customs duty. The Court restored the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, as the import was deemed illegitimate under Border Trade provisions due to the misuse of the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=341506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 67 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241842</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the import of raw silk from China did not align with the intended purpose of the exemption notification and was a misuse to evade customs duty. The Court restored the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, as the import was deemed illegitimate under Border Trade provisions due to the misuse of the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>